Allegations of Vote Buying and Questionable Categories Surround ABSU SUG Awards
Abia State University students express frustration over perceived irregularities and demand transparency in Student Union Government (SUG) Awards. The student community are raising concerns about the award process, labeling the events as marred by irregularities and financial influence.
Mary Nwaeze 
In a recent development at the Abia State University (ABSU), students are raising concerns about the Student Union Government (SUG) Awards, labeling the events as marred by irregularities and financial influence.
The controversy stems from allegations of vote buying, as some students claim that certain award categories were influenced by monetary contributions rather than merit. The awards, intended to recognize outstanding achievements within the student body, are now under scrutiny for deviating from their original purpose.
READ: Shockwaves at ABSU as Five Students Face Expulsion Over Rape and Cult Activities
One student, who supported the monetization of the awards in the hopes of generating funds for SUG projects, expressed disappointment at the apparent lack of transparency in the process. The student argued that certain categories, such as "Therapist of the Year" and "Media Personality of the Year," were deemed unnecessary for a student environment.
Furthermore, specific winners have come under scrutiny, with claims that some recipients may not have deserved their awards. The student mentioned a friend, Chikezie Favour, who won the "Film Maker of the Year" category, questioning the legitimacy of the award by pointing out the lack of evidence of any directed films by the recipient.
RECOMMENDED: MDCN Issues Ultimatum to Abia State University Medical College Amid Threats of Closure
The controversy extends to categories like "Celebrity of the Year," where students question the criteria for nomination and suspect that financial contributions played a significant role in the selection process.
Criticism is also directed at the "Most Brilliant Student of the Year" category, where concerns about the influence of money in determining the winner have been raised. Students argue that academic excellence should be the primary factor in such categories and that paying for votes undermines the credibility of the awards.
SEE THIS: ABSU NURSING STUDENTS SHINE IN NOVEMBER NURSING AND MIDWIFERY COUNCIL EXAMS
The "Media Blog of the Year" category faced severe backlash, with students asserting that the winner lacked the impact and contribution to student life that other prominent blogs provided. The call for a more thorough evaluation of nominees and winners is resonating among students who believe that the accolades should be given to those who have genuinely made a positive impact on the student community.
Students are now demanding a review of the award process, advocating for greater transparency, and emphasizing the importance of merit-based recognition over financial influence. The controversy has sparked a broader conversation about the integrity of student awards and the need for a fair and impartial selection process.
