REJOINDER: UNIABUJA VC was Neither Summoned nor Retrained by the Federal High Court

REJOINDER: UNIABUJA VC was Neither Summoned nor Retrained by the Federal High Court

REJOINDER: UNIABUJA VC was Neither Summoned nor Retrained by the Federal High Court

The attention of the Management of the University of Abuja has been drawn to misleading reports in  some news media that the vice chancellor, Professor Abdul-Rasheed Na'Allah has been summoned by the federal high court, Abuja to appear before it over the inauguration of the University Governing Council.

The reports further indicated that the court has granted an order restraining the vice chancellor from conducting an inauguration of the newly elected internal council members of the University.

 

Read Also:UNIMAID Releases Important Announcement for Bio 203 Students

READ ALSO: Ahman Pategi University Pro-Chancellor Hon. Aliyu Ahman Patigi Passes Away After Treatment in India

To set the record straight, the court only ordered that all the defendants including the Vice-chancellor, the President, the Attorney General of the Federation and the National Universities Commission,  be put on notice of the motion filed by the plaintiffs, to enable the Defendants to show cause why the prayers of the Plaintiffs should not be granted. 

Management clarifies that the court did not summon the Vice-chancellor, rather, the order of the court presided over by Justice Inyang Ekwo was directed at the plaintiffs to put the Defendants on notice of their motion within three days of the order.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU: NANS Kogi State to Host 3-Day Student Security Summit Addressing Campus Safety Issues

 

Read Also:PANS Cultural Day: A Celebration of Diversity and Unity at UNIMAID

 

Management also notes that it is not aware of any court order restraining the University from taking any step for that matter. If such order is served on it, Management will comply appropriately.

YOU MIGHT LIKE: OAU Honors Akinyuwa Susan Busola as 2022/2023 Faculty of Pharmacy Best Graduating Student

Management states that these deliberate misrepresentations of the order of the court in the media were clearly calculated to create the impression in the public domain that the vice-chancellor had been found culpable of something for which he had been summoned and consequently embarrass him and the University. Nothing can be further from the truth.

 

Read Also:UNIMAID Second Semester Provisional CA Timetable, 2022/2023 session

The reports smack of irresponsible journalism and the desperate manipulations of the plaintiffs in the pursuit of their nefarious purposes.

Management therefore urges members of the University community and the general public to disregard these false and malicious publications.