MAPOLY Students Union Electoral Committee Screening Process Sparks Controversy Among Student Leaders

The recently concluded SUELECO screening process at Moshood Abiola Polytechnic (MAPOLY) has ignited controversy among student leaders, with allegations of irregularities, lack of transparency, and last-minute alterations fueling heated debates across campus.

The screening, which was meant to ensure a fair selection process, has drawn criticism from some student leaders who claim that several breaches tainted the exercise. Reports suggest that late submissions were accepted beyond the stipulated February 3, 2024, deadline, and that certain aspirants continued seeking signatures even after the screening had officially concluded. Additionally, concerns have been raised over discrepancies in the final list, with 10 names appearing despite only 7 aspirants reportedly undergoing the screening.

Afolabi Wasiu (Peaceman), the Immediate Past President of the Association of Mass Communication Students (AMACOS) for the 2023/2024 academic session, has been vocal in condemning the process. Alongside other student leaders, he has accused the committee of failing to adhere to established guidelines and disqualifying candidates without clear justification. Wasiu has also stated that video and pictorial evidence of the alleged irregularities have been compiled and will be presented to the school management for review.

On the other hand, Shotayo Samson, President of the Computer Science Department (2023/2024), has distanced himself from the claims circulating on social media, refuting allegations that all department presidents are collectively questioning the credibility of the process. In a signed statement, Samson expressed confidence in the SUELECO screening committee and urged concerned individuals to channel their grievances through the appropriate authorities.

The student community at MAPOLY remains divided over the issue. While some support the actions of the screening committee, others are calling for an immediate review of the process to ensure fairness and transparency. As tensions escalate, various student leaders have begun issuing individual statements either backing or challenging the ongoing petition against the committee.

With the controversy gaining momentum, all eyes are now on the school authorities as students await an official response on the fate of the screening process.